apparatus: has state job

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents machine
Weight: 0.65
, electronic device
Weight: 0.63
, configuration
Weight: 0.58
, structure
Weight: 0.58
Siblings vacuum tube
Weight: 0.62
, elevator
Weight: 0.61
, test tube
Weight: 0.61
, boiler
Weight: 0.60
, condenser
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state job 1.00
has state jobs 0.88
jobs 0.78
has state last 0.78
is work 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(apparatus, has state job)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(boiler, has state jobs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(apparatus, has state job)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(boiler, jobs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(apparatus, has state job)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(vacuum tube, has state last)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(apparatus, has state job)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(condenser, is work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(apparatus, has state job)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(boiler, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(boiler, has state jobs)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(apparatus, has state job)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(condenser, is work)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(condenser, is work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(apparatus, has state job)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(boiler, jobs)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(boiler, jobs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(apparatus, has state job)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(vacuum tube, has state last)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(vacuum tube, has state last)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(apparatus, has state job)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(apparatus, has state job)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(apparatus, has state job)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(apparatus, has state job)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(apparatus, has state job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(apparatus, has state job)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(apparatus, has state job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(apparatus, has state job)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(boiler, has state jobs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(apparatus, has state job)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(boiler, jobs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(apparatus, has state job)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(condenser, is work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(apparatus, has state job)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(vacuum tube, has state last)