appearance: be important in communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.66
, feature
Weight: 0.63
, form
Weight: 0.62
, condition
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings recent
Weight: 0.36
, arrival
Weight: 0.32
, tour
Weight: 0.32
, ascension
Weight: 0.32
, wedding reception
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in communication 1.00
be important in macbeth 0.78
be important in servicescapes 0.78
be important in access 0.77
be important in business 0.76
be important at work 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(appearance, be important in communication)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(form, be important in access)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(appearance, be important in communication)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(appearance, be important in communication)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(form, be important in access)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(condition, be important in servicescapes)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(form, be important in access)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(appearance, be important in communication)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(form, be important in access)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(appearance, be important in communication)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(appearance, be important in communication)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(appearance, be important in communication)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(appearance, be important in macbeth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(appearance, be important in macbeth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(appearance, be important in macbeth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(appearance, be important at work)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(appearance, be important at work)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(appearance, be important at work)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(appearance, be important at work)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(appearance, be important in macbeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(appearance, be important in communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(appearance, be important in communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(form, be important in access)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(condition, be important in servicescapes)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(condition, be important in servicescapes)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(form, be important in access)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(appearance, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)