appearance: is imporant

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.66
, feature
Weight: 0.63
, form
Weight: 0.62
, condition
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings recent
Weight: 0.36
, arrival
Weight: 0.32
, tour
Weight: 0.32
, ascension
Weight: 0.32
, wedding reception
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is imporant 1.00
be important in macbeth 0.77
be important in servicescapes 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(appearance, is imporant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(appearance, is imporant)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(appearance, is imporant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(condition, be important in servicescapes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(appearance, is imporant)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(appearance, is imporant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(appearance, is imporant)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(appearance, is imporant)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(appearance, is imporant)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(appearance, be important in macbeth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(appearance, is imporant)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(appearance, be important in macbeth)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(appearance, is imporant)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(appearance, be important in macbeth)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(appearance, is imporant)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(appearance, be important in macbeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(appearance, is imporant)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(appearance, is imporant)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(appearance, is imporant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(appearance, is imporant)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(appearance, is imporant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(appearance, is imporant)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(condition, be important in servicescapes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(appearance, is imporant)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(condition, be important in servicescapes)