apple tree: be at illinois

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit tree
Weight: 0.90
, tree
Weight: 0.80
, plant
Weight: 0.67
, crop
Weight: 0.62
Siblings pear tree
Weight: 0.45
, cherry tree
Weight: 0.44
, oak tree
Weight: 0.44
, maple tree
Weight: 0.42
, christmas tree
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at illinois 1.00
be at michigan 0.84
be at wisconsin 0.84
be at indiana 0.83
be at oklahoma 0.82
be at ohio 0.82
be at winchester virginia 0.81
be at pennsylvania 0.81
be at florida 0.81
be at america 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(apple tree, be at illinois)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at ohio)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(apple tree, be at ohio)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at oklahoma)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at pennsylvania)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(apple tree, be at oklahoma)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at michigan)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at wisconsin)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(apple tree, be at michigan)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at indiana)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at winchester virginia)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(apple tree, be at florida)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at florida)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at pennsylvania)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at america)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(apple tree, be at winchester virginia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(apple tree, be at pennsylvania)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(apple tree, be at indiana)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(apple tree, be at america)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(apple tree, be at wisconsin)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at indiana)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at michigan)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at wisconsin)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at florida)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at wisconsin)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at america)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at indiana)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at winchester virginia)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at oklahoma)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at oklahoma)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at michigan)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at ohio)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at winchester virginia)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at ohio)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at america)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at florida)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at pennsylvania)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at illinois)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at illinois)