apple: be at produce section of supermarket

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit
Weight: 0.67
, dessert
Weight: 0.65
, item
Weight: 0.64
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.63
Siblings apple pie
Weight: 0.74
, cherry
Weight: 0.65
, macintosh
Weight: 0.55
, apple tree
Weight: 0.41
, apple juice
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at produce section of supermarket 1.00
be at produce section 0.91
be at supermarket 0.87
be at grocery store 0.83
be find in store 0.79
be at store 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(item, be at store)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(item, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(item, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cherry, be at supermarket)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cherry, be at grocery store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(item, be at store)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(cherry, be at supermarket)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cherry, be at supermarket)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cherry, be at grocery store)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cherry, be at grocery store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(apple, be at supermarket)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(apple, be at grocery store)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(apple, be at supermarket)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(apple, be find in store)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(apple, be at supermarket)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(apple, be at grocery store)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(apple, be at supermarket)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(apple, be find in store)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(apple, be at grocery store)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(apple, be at grocery store)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(apple, be find in store)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(apple, be find in store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(item, be at store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cherry, be at supermarket)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(cherry, be at grocery store)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(apple, be at produce section of supermarket)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(item, be at store)