appraisal: be important in workplace

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents real estate
Weight: 0.65
, property
Weight: 0.62
, evaluation
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.57
, cost
Weight: 0.57
Siblings real estate agent
Weight: 0.34
, appraiser
Weight: 0.34
, condo
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in workplace 1.00
be important in social work 0.79
be important for employees 0.78
be important in society 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(evaluation, be important in social work)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(appraisal, be important in workplace)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(property, be important in society)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(appraisal, be important in workplace)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(appraisal, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(evaluation, be important in social work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(appraisal, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(property, be important in society)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(property, be important in society)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(evaluation, be important in social work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(business activity, be important in society)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(evaluation, be important in social work)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(appraisal, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(appraisal, be important in workplace)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(property, be important in society)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(appraisal, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(appraisal, be important in workplace)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(appraisal, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(business activity, be important in society)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(business activity, be important in society)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(appraisal, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(appraisal, be important in workplace)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(appraisal, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(appraisal, be important for employees)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(appraisal, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(appraisal, be important for employees)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(appraisal, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(appraisal, be important for employees)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(appraisal, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, be important for employees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(appraisal, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(appraisal, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, be important in workplace)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(appraisal, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(appraisal, be important in workplace)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(evaluation, be important in social work)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(property, be important in society)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(appraisal, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(business activity, be important in society)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(appraisal, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(evaluation, be important in social work)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(appraisal, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(property, be important in society)