approach: example

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.70
, concept
Weight: 0.66
, matter
Weight: 0.63
, fundamental
Weight: 0.62
Siblings method
Weight: 0.72
, philosophy
Weight: 0.66
, process
Weight: 0.66
, gene therapy
Weight: 0.64
, model
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
example 1.00
examples 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(approach, example)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(approach, example)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(approach, example)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(approach, examples)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(approach, example)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(approach, examples)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(approach, example)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(approach, examples)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(approach, example)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(approach, examples)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(approach, example)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(approach, example)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(approach, example)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(approach, example)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(approach, example)