aquamarine: be worth per carat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stone
Weight: 0.65
, gem
Weight: 0.65
, film
Weight: 0.50
, crystal
Weight: 0.49
, beryl
Weight: 0.42
Siblings turquoise
Weight: 0.37
, emerald
Weight: 0.36
, sapphire
Weight: 0.35
, peridot
Weight: 0.35
, opal
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be worth per carat 1.00
be per carat 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aquamarine, be worth per carat)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(opal, be per carat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(aquamarine, be worth per carat)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(opal, be per carat)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(opal, be per carat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(aquamarine, be worth per carat)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(aquamarine, be worth per carat)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(aquamarine, be worth per carat)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(aquamarine, be per carat)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(aquamarine, be worth per carat)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(aquamarine, be per carat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(aquamarine, be worth per carat)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(aquamarine, be per carat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(aquamarine, be worth per carat)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(aquamarine, be per carat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(aquamarine, be worth per carat)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(aquamarine, be worth per carat)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aquamarine, be worth per carat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(aquamarine, be worth per carat)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(aquamarine, be worth per carat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aquamarine, be worth per carat)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(opal, be per carat)