aquarium: be considered micro ecosystems

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.60
, site
Weight: 0.59
, exhibit
Weight: 0.59
, museum
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.56
Siblings zoo
Weight: 0.35
, marina
Weight: 0.33
, park
Weight: 0.33
, amusement park
Weight: 0.33
, city hall
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered micro ecosystems 1.00
be considered ecosystems 0.90
provide habitats 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(aquarium, be considered micro ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(aquarium, be considered micro ecosystems)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(aquarium, be considered micro ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, be considered ecosystems)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(aquarium, be considered micro ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(aquarium, be considered ecosystems)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(aquarium, be considered micro ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(aquarium, provide habitats)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(aquarium, be considered micro ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, provide habitats)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(aquarium, be considered micro ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(aquarium, be considered ecosystems)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(aquarium, be considered micro ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(aquarium, be considered ecosystems)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(aquarium, be considered micro ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(aquarium, provide habitats)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(aquarium, be considered micro ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(aquarium, provide habitats)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(aquarium, be considered micro ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(aquarium, be considered micro ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(aquarium, be considered micro ecosystems)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(aquarium, be considered micro ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(aquarium, be considered micro ecosystems)