arbitrator: bridge gap

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.57
, lawyer
Weight: 0.54
, matter
Weight: 0.48
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
bridge gap 1.00
bridge difference 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(arbitrator, bridge gap)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(arbitrator, bridge gap)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(arbitrator, bridge gap)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(arbitrator, bridge difference)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(arbitrator, bridge gap)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(arbitrator, bridge difference)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(arbitrator, bridge gap)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(arbitrator, bridge difference)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(arbitrator, bridge gap)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(arbitrator, bridge difference)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(arbitrator, bridge gap)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(arbitrator, bridge gap)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(arbitrator, bridge gap)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(arbitrator, bridge gap)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(arbitrator, bridge gap)