arch: be in st louis

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.68
, feature
Weight: 0.58
, pattern
Weight: 0.56
, site
Weight: 0.56
Siblings dome
Weight: 0.34
, pyramid
Weight: 0.34
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.34
, skyscraper
Weight: 0.33
, helix
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in st louis 1.00
be in paris 0.76
be in las vegas 0.75
milwaukee 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arch, be in st louis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(dome, milwaukee)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arch, be in st louis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(eiffel tower, be in las vegas)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arch, be in st louis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(eiffel tower, be in paris)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(arch, be in st louis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(eiffel tower, be in paris) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(eiffel tower, be in paris)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(arch, be in st louis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(eiffel tower, be in las vegas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(eiffel tower, be in las vegas)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(arch, be in st louis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(dome, milwaukee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(dome, milwaukee)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(arch, be in st louis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(arch, be in st louis)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(arch, be in st louis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(arch, be in st louis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arch, be in st louis)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(arch, be in st louis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(arch, be in st louis)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arch, be in st louis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(eiffel tower, be in paris)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arch, be in st louis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(eiffel tower, be in las vegas)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arch, be in st louis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(dome, milwaukee)