architect: use fractions

Related concepts

Parents	contractor Weight: 0.71 , design Weight: 0.71 , artist Weight: 0.64 , plan Weight: 0.63 , specialist Weight: 0.62
Siblings	engineer Weight: 0.36 , builder Weight: 0.35 , painter Weight: 0.35 , carpenter Weight: 0.34 , construction worker Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
use fractions	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(architect, use fractions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(construction worker, use fractions)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(architect, use fractions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(construction worker, use fractions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(construction worker, use fractions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(architect, use fractions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Salient(architect, use fractions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.18

Salient(architect, use fractions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(architect, use fractions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(architect, use fractions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(architect, use fractions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(architect, use fractions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(architect, use fractions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(construction worker, use fractions)