architect: use macs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contractor
Weight: 0.71
, design
Weight: 0.71
, artist
Weight: 0.64
, plan
Weight: 0.63
, specialist
Weight: 0.62
Siblings engineer
Weight: 0.36
, builder
Weight: 0.35
, painter
Weight: 0.35
, carpenter
Weight: 0.34
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
use macs 1.00
use photoshop 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(architect, use macs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(architect, use macs)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(architect, use macs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(architect, use photoshop)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(architect, use macs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(architect, use photoshop)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(architect, use macs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(architect, use photoshop)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(architect, use macs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(architect, use photoshop)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(architect, use macs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(architect, use macs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(architect, use macs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(architect, use macs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(architect, use macs)