architect: use scientific notation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contractor
Weight: 0.71
, design
Weight: 0.71
, artist
Weight: 0.64
, plan
Weight: 0.63
, specialist
Weight: 0.62
Siblings engineer
Weight: 0.36
, builder
Weight: 0.35
, painter
Weight: 0.35
, carpenter
Weight: 0.34
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
use scientific notation 1.00
use science 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(architect, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(architect, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(engineer, use science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(engineer, use science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(architect, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(architect, use scientific notation)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(architect, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(architect, use science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(architect, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(architect, use science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(architect, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(architect, use science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(architect, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(architect, use science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(architect, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(architect, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(architect, use scientific notation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(architect, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(architect, use scientific notation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(architect, use scientific notation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(engineer, use science)