architecture: is good career

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.65
, technology
Weight: 0.63
, sculpture
Weight: 0.62
Siblings castle
Weight: 0.61
, pyramid
Weight: 0.60
, skyscraper
Weight: 0.49
, steeple
Weight: 0.44

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good career 1.00
is career 0.97
is good career choice 0.93
is good job 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(architecture, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(architecture, is good career)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(architecture, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(architecture, is good career choice)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(architecture, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(architecture, is good career choice)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(architecture, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(architecture, is good career choice)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(architecture, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(architecture, is good career choice)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(architecture, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(architecture, is career)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(architecture, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(architecture, is career)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(architecture, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(architecture, is career)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(architecture, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(architecture, is career)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(architecture, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(architecture, is good job)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(architecture, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(architecture, is good job)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(architecture, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(architecture, is good job)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(architecture, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(architecture, is good job)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(architecture, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(architecture, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(architecture, is good career)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(architecture, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(architecture, is good career)