area: be defined as size of city

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents zone
Weight: 0.71
, national park
Weight: 0.70
, route
Weight: 0.63
, landmark
Weight: 0.61
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.71
, south dakota
Weight: 0.70
, north carolina
Weight: 0.69
, north dakota
Weight: 0.69
, town
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be defined as size of city 1.00
be at city 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(landmark, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(area, be defined as size of city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(area, be defined as size of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(landmark, be at city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(area, be defined as size of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(landmark, be at city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(area, be defined as size of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(town, be at city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(landmark, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(area, be defined as size of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(area, be defined as size of city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(area, be defined as size of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(town, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(town, be at city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(area, be defined as size of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(area, be defined as size of city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(area, be defined as size of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(area, be defined as size of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(area, be defined as size of city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(area, be defined as size of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(area, be defined as size of city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(area, be defined as size of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(landmark, be at city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(area, be defined as size of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(town, be at city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(area, be defined as size of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(landmark, be at city)