area: be in arctic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents zone
Weight: 0.71
, region
Weight: 0.65
, route
Weight: 0.63
, landmark
Weight: 0.61
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.71
, national park
Weight: 0.70
, south dakota
Weight: 0.70
, north carolina
Weight: 0.69
, north dakota
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in arctic 1.00
be after arctic 0.98
have cold temperatures 0.78
have coldest temperatures 0.77
is cold 0.76
be near equator warmer 0.76
be near cold ocean currents deserts 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(region, have coldest temperatures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(area, be in arctic)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(zone, have cold temperatures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(area, be in arctic)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(region, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(area, be in arctic)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(area, be in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(zone, have cold temperatures)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(area, be in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(region, is cold)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(area, be in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(region, have coldest temperatures)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(area, be in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(zone, have cold temperatures)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(area, be in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(region, have coldest temperatures)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(area, be in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(region, is cold)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(area, be in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(south dakota, is cold)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(region, have coldest temperatures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(area, be in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(area, be in arctic)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(zone, have cold temperatures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(area, be in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(area, be in arctic)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(region, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(area, be in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(area, be in arctic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(area, be in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(south dakota, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(south dakota, is cold)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(area, be in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(area, be in arctic)

Similarity expansion

0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(area, be in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(area, be near cold ocean currents deserts)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(area, be in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(area, be near cold ocean currents deserts)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(area, be in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(area, be near cold ocean currents deserts)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(area, be in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(area, be near cold ocean currents deserts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(area, be in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(area, be in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(area, be in arctic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(area, be in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(area, be in arctic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(area, be in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(zone, have cold temperatures)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(area, be in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(region, is cold)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(area, be in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(region, have coldest temperatures)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(area, be in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(south dakota, is cold)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(area, be in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(region, is cold)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(area, be in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(zone, have cold temperatures)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(area, be in arctic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(region, have coldest temperatures)