area: be labeled square units

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents zone
Weight: 0.71
, region
Weight: 0.65
, route
Weight: 0.63
, landmark
Weight: 0.61
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.71
, national park
Weight: 0.70
, south dakota
Weight: 0.70
, north carolina
Weight: 0.69
, north dakota
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be labeled square units 1.00
be labeled with square units 1.00
be labeled units 0.93
be labeled with units 0.93
be in square units 0.91
have square units 0.91
be measured in square units 0.90
be written in square units 0.89
be written with square units 0.89
be stated in square units 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(area, be labeled square units)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(area, be labeled square units)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(area, be labeled square units)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(area, be written in square units)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(area, be labeled square units)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(area, be written in square units)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(area, be labeled square units)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(area, be written in square units)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(area, be labeled square units)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(area, be stated in square units)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(area, be labeled square units)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(area, be stated in square units)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(area, be labeled square units)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(area, be measured in square units)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(area, be labeled square units)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(area, be measured in square units)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(area, be labeled square units)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(area, be written with square units)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(area, be labeled square units)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(area, be measured in square units)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(area, be labeled square units)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(area, be stated in square units)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(area, be labeled square units)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(area, be written in square units)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(area, be labeled square units)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(area, be written with square units)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(area, be labeled square units)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(area, have square units)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(area, be labeled square units)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(area, be stated in square units)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(area, be labeled square units)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(area, be written with square units)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(area, be labeled square units)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(area, have square units)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(area, be labeled square units)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(area, be measured in square units)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(area, be labeled square units)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(area, be written with square units)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(area, be labeled square units)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(area, have square units)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(area, be labeled square units)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(area, have square units)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(area, be labeled square units)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(area, be labeled square units)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(area, be labeled square units)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(area, be labeled square units)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(area, be labeled square units)