area: be near equator wet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents zone
Weight: 0.71
, region
Weight: 0.65
, route
Weight: 0.63
, landmark
Weight: 0.61
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.71
, national park
Weight: 0.70
, south dakota
Weight: 0.70
, north carolina
Weight: 0.69
, north dakota
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be near equator wet 1.00
be near to equator 0.95
be near equator 0.95
be near equator warmer 0.94
be near to equator hotter 0.92
be close to equator 0.92
be close to equator warmer 0.92
farthest from equator 0.86
be near cold ocean currents deserts 0.81
be near ocean 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(region, be near to equator hotter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(area, be near equator wet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(area, be near equator wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(region, be near to equator hotter)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(area, be near equator wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(region, be near to equator hotter)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(region, be near to equator hotter) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(area, be near equator wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(area, be near equator wet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(area, be near equator wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(area, be near equator wet)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(area, be near equator wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(area, be near equator)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(area, be near equator wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(area, be near equator)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(area, be near equator wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(area, be near equator)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(area, be near equator wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(area, be close to equator warmer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(area, be near equator wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(area, farthest from equator)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(area, be near equator wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(area, be near equator wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(area, be near equator wet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(area, be near equator wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(area, be near equator wet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(area, be near equator wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(region, be near to equator hotter)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(area, be near equator wet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(region, be near to equator hotter)