area: be written with units

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents zone
Weight: 0.71
, region
Weight: 0.65
, route
Weight: 0.63
, landmark
Weight: 0.61
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.71
, national park
Weight: 0.70
, south dakota
Weight: 0.70
, north carolina
Weight: 0.69
, north dakota
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be written with units 1.00
be written in units 0.99
be written with square units 0.92
be written in square units 0.91
be used with units 0.90
have units 0.89
be wrote in units 0.89
be in units 0.89
be stated in units 0.85
be labeled with units 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(area, be written with units)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(area, be written with units)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(area, be written with units)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(area, be written in units)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(area, be written with units)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(area, be written in square units)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(area, be written with units)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(area, be written with square units)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(area, be written with units)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(area, be written in units)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(area, be written with units)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(area, be written in units)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(area, be written with units)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(area, be written in square units)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(area, be written with units)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(area, be written in square units)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(area, be written with units)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(area, be written with square units)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(area, be written with units)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(area, be written in units)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(area, be written with units)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(area, be written with square units)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(area, be written with units)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(area, be written in square units)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(area, be written with units)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(area, be written with square units)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(area, be written with units)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(area, be written with units)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(area, be written with units)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(area, be written with units)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(area, be written with units)