area: differ from volume

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents zone
Weight: 0.71
, region
Weight: 0.65
, route
Weight: 0.63
, landmark
Weight: 0.61
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.71
, national park
Weight: 0.70
, south dakota
Weight: 0.70
, north carolina
Weight: 0.69
, north dakota
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
differ from volume 1.00
be related to volume 0.86
vary in size 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(region, vary in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(area, differ from volume)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(area, differ from volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(region, vary in size)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(area, differ from volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(region, vary in size)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(region, vary in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(area, differ from volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(area, differ from volume)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(area, differ from volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(area, differ from volume)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(area, differ from volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(area, be related to volume)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(area, differ from volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(area, be related to volume)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(area, differ from volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(area, be related to volume)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(area, differ from volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(area, be related to volume)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(area, differ from volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(area, differ from volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(area, differ from volume)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(area, differ from volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(area, differ from volume)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(area, differ from volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(region, vary in size)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(area, differ from volume) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(region, vary in size)