area: work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents zone
Weight: 0.71
, region
Weight: 0.65
, route
Weight: 0.63
, landmark
Weight: 0.61
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.71
, national park
Weight: 0.70
, south dakota
Weight: 0.70
, north carolina
Weight: 0.69
, north dakota
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
work 1.00
work in smt 0.98
work for practice 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(route, work in smt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(area, work)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(region, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(area, work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(route, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(area, work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(zone, work for practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(area, work)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(zone, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(area, work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(zone, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(route, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(region, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(route, work in smt)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(zone, work for practice)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(zone, work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(region, work)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(route, work)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(route, work in smt)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(zone, work for practice)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(route, work in smt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(area, work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(region, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(area, work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(route, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(area, work)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(zone, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(area, work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(zone, work for practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(area, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(area, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(area, work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(area, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(route, work)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(zone, work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(region, work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(route, work in smt)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(zone, work for practice)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(route, work)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(zone, work)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(region, work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(route, work in smt)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(area, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(zone, work for practice)