argos: be cheaper than apple

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shop
Weight: 0.51
, store
Weight: 0.42
, company
Weight: 0.41
, brand
Weight: 0.35
, place
Weight: 0.33
Siblings clothing store
Weight: 0.28
, barber shop
Weight: 0.27
, body shop
Weight: 0.27
, hardware store
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than apple 1.00
is expensive 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(brand, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(argos, be cheaper than apple)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(argos, be cheaper than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(brand, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(argos, be cheaper than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(brand, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(argos, be cheaper than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(barber shop, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(argos, be cheaper than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(body shop, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(argos, be cheaper than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(clothing store, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(brand, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(argos, be cheaper than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(argos, be cheaper than apple)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(argos, be cheaper than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(clothing store, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(clothing store, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(argos, be cheaper than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(body shop, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(body shop, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(argos, be cheaper than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(barber shop, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(barber shop, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(argos, be cheaper than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(argos, be cheaper than apple)

Similarity expansion

0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(argos, be cheaper than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(argos, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(argos, be cheaper than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(argos, is expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(argos, be cheaper than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(argos, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(argos, be cheaper than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(argos, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(argos, be cheaper than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(argos, be cheaper than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(argos, be cheaper than apple)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(argos, be cheaper than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(argos, be cheaper than apple)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(argos, be cheaper than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(brand, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(argos, be cheaper than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(clothing store, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(argos, be cheaper than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(barber shop, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(argos, be cheaper than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(body shop, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(argos, be cheaper than apple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(brand, is expensive)