arkansas: play football in rock

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.57
, school
Weight: 0.55
, alabama
Weight: 0.55
Siblings idaho
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, oregon
Weight: 0.34
, nebraska
Weight: 0.34
, georgia
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
play football in rock 1.00
play football in little rock 0.97
be bad at football 0.86
play at state 0.79
play in two stadiums 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, play football in rock)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, be bad at football)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, play football in rock)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be bad at football)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(arkansas, play football in rock)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(tennessee, be bad at football)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(tennessee, be bad at football)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(arkansas, play football in rock)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(nebraska, be bad at football)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(nebraska, be bad at football)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(arkansas, play football in rock)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(arkansas, play football in rock)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(arkansas, play football in rock)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, play football in little rock)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(arkansas, play football in rock)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(arkansas, play football in little rock)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(arkansas, play football in rock)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(arkansas, play football in little rock)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(arkansas, play football in rock)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, be bad at football)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(arkansas, play football in rock)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(arkansas, be bad at football)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(arkansas, play football in rock)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(arkansas, be bad at football)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(arkansas, play football in rock)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(arkansas, play football in little rock)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(arkansas, play football in rock)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arkansas, play at state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(arkansas, play football in rock)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(arkansas, be bad at football)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(arkansas, play football in rock)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, play in two stadiums)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(arkansas, play football in rock)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(arkansas, play in two stadiums)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(arkansas, play football in rock)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(arkansas, play at state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(arkansas, play football in rock)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(arkansas, play in two stadiums)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(arkansas, play football in rock)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(arkansas, play in two stadiums)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(arkansas, play football in rock)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(arkansas, play at state)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(arkansas, play football in rock)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, play at state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(arkansas, play football in rock)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(arkansas, play football in rock)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, play football in rock)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(arkansas, play football in rock)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(arkansas, play football in rock)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, play football in rock)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(tennessee, be bad at football)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, play football in rock)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(nebraska, be bad at football)