armor: was made during renaissance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.59
, object
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, feature
Weight: 0.54
Siblings bulletproof vest
Weight: 0.63
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.33
, titanium dioxide
Weight: 0.33
, steel wool
Weight: 0.32
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
was made during renaissance 1.00
was made 0.79
was made in times 0.78
be made 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(material, be made)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(armor, was made during renaissance)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(armor, was made during renaissance)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(material, be made)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(armor, was made during renaissance)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(material, be made)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(armor, was made during renaissance)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be made)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(material, be made)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(armor, was made during renaissance)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(armor, was made during renaissance)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(armor, was made during renaissance)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(aluminum foil, be made)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be made)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(armor, was made during renaissance)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(armor, was made during renaissance)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(armor, was made during renaissance)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(armor, was made)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(armor, was made during renaissance)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(armor, was made in times)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(armor, was made during renaissance)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(armor, be made)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(armor, was made during renaissance)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(armor, was made in times)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(armor, was made during renaissance)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(armor, was made in times)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(armor, was made during renaissance)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(armor, was made in times)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(armor, was made during renaissance)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(armor, be made)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(armor, was made during renaissance)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(armor, was made)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(armor, was made during renaissance)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(armor, be made)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(armor, was made during renaissance)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(armor, was made)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(armor, was made during renaissance)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(armor, be made)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(armor, was made during renaissance)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(armor, was made)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(armor, was made during renaissance)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(armor, was made during renaissance)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(armor, was made during renaissance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(armor, was made during renaissance)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(armor, was made during renaissance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(armor, was made during renaissance)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(material, be made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(armor, was made during renaissance)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be made)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(armor, was made during renaissance)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(material, be made)