art: highly valued in history

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artifact
Weight: 0.66
, tool
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.62
, knowledge
Weight: 0.61
Siblings calligraphy
Weight: 0.73
, needlework
Weight: 0.68
, ballet
Weight: 0.68
, cinema
Weight: 0.68
, quilting
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
highly valued in history 1.00
be valued weapons 0.79
be important to history 0.78
be monetarily valued 0.76
be related to history 0.76
be significant to history 0.76
has time history 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(artifact, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(art, highly valued in history)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(art, highly valued in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(artifact, be important to history)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(art, highly valued in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(artifact, be important to history)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(artifact, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(art, highly valued in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(art, highly valued in history)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(art, highly valued in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(art, highly valued in history)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(art, highly valued in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(art, be important to history)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(art, highly valued in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(art, be important to history)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(art, highly valued in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(art, be related to history)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(art, highly valued in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(art, be significant to history)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(art, highly valued in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(art, has time history)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(art, highly valued in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(art, be important to history)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(art, highly valued in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(art, be related to history)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(art, highly valued in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(art, be significant to history)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(art, highly valued in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(art, be related to history)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(art, highly valued in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(art, has time history)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(art, highly valued in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(art, be significant to history)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(art, highly valued in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(art, has time history)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(art, highly valued in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(art, be significant to history)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(art, highly valued in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(art, be related to history)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(art, highly valued in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(art, be important to history)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(art, highly valued in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(art, has time history)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(art, highly valued in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(art, highly valued in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(art, highly valued in history)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(art, highly valued in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(art, highly valued in history)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(art, highly valued in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(artifact, be important to history)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(art, highly valued in history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(artifact, be important to history)