arthropod: be successful as phylum

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents invertebrate
Weight: 0.67
, organism
Weight: 0.58
, animal
Weight: 0.55
, parasite
Weight: 0.49
Siblings centipede
Weight: 0.68
, crustacean
Weight: 0.58
, arachnid
Weight: 0.57
, insect
Weight: 0.37
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be successful as phylum 1.00
is successful phylum 0.99
is most successful phylum 0.98
be regarded as successful phylum 0.96
is phylum 0.94
phylum 0.94
be regarded as most successful phylum 0.94
be regarded as phylum 0.92
is largest phylum 0.89
be more advanced than phylum 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arthropod, be successful as phylum)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(arthropod, be successful as phylum)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(arthropod, be successful as phylum)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(arthropod, phylum)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arthropod, be successful as phylum)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(arthropod, phylum)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(arthropod, be successful as phylum)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(arthropod, phylum)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(arthropod, be successful as phylum)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(arthropod, is most successful phylum)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(arthropod, be successful as phylum)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(arthropod, is most successful phylum)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(arthropod, be successful as phylum)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(arthropod, be regarded as most successful phylum)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arthropod, be successful as phylum)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(arthropod, is most successful phylum)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(arthropod, be successful as phylum)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, is most successful phylum)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(arthropod, be successful as phylum)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(arthropod, is largest phylum)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(arthropod, be successful as phylum)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(arthropod, is largest phylum)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(arthropod, be successful as phylum)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(arthropod, be regarded as most successful phylum)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arthropod, be successful as phylum)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(arthropod, be regarded as most successful phylum)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arthropod, be successful as phylum)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(arthropod, is largest phylum)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(arthropod, be successful as phylum)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, be regarded as most successful phylum)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(arthropod, be successful as phylum)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, is largest phylum)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(arthropod, be successful as phylum)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, phylum)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(arthropod, be successful as phylum)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(arthropod, be successful as phylum)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, be successful as phylum)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(arthropod, be successful as phylum)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(arthropod, be successful as phylum)