arthropod: respond to stimuli

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents invertebrate
Weight: 0.67
, organism
Weight: 0.58
, animal
Weight: 0.55
, parasite
Weight: 0.49
Siblings centipede
Weight: 0.68
, arachnid
Weight: 0.57
, insect
Weight: 0.37
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
respond to stimuli 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(invertebrate, respond to stimuli) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(arthropod, respond to stimuli)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(arthropod, respond to stimuli) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(invertebrate, respond to stimuli)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, respond to stimuli) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(invertebrate, respond to stimuli)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, respond to stimuli) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(centipede, respond to stimuli)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(invertebrate, respond to stimuli) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(arthropod, respond to stimuli) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(arthropod, respond to stimuli)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(arthropod, respond to stimuli) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(centipede, respond to stimuli) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(centipede, respond to stimuli)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(arthropod, respond to stimuli) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(arthropod, respond to stimuli)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(arthropod, respond to stimuli) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(arthropod, respond to stimuli) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, respond to stimuli)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(arthropod, respond to stimuli) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(arthropod, respond to stimuli)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, respond to stimuli) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(invertebrate, respond to stimuli)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, respond to stimuli) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(centipede, respond to stimuli)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(arthropod, respond to stimuli) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(invertebrate, respond to stimuli)