artificial intelligence: has state challenge

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.68
, computer science
Weight: 0.65
, development
Weight: 0.64
, discipline
Weight: 0.63
, intelligence
Weight: 0.62
Siblings military intelligence
Weight: 0.39
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.34
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.33
, logic
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state challenge 1.00
is global challenge 0.88
has state problem 0.83
is threat 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(discipline, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(technology, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(technology, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(discipline, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(technology, has state problem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(discipline, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(discipline, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(technology, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, is threat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, has state problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(artificial intelligence, has state problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(artificial intelligence, has state problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(artificial intelligence, is global challenge)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, is global challenge)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, is global challenge)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(artificial intelligence, is global challenge)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(artificial intelligence, is threat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, has state problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(artificial intelligence, is threat)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, is threat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(technology, has state problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(discipline, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(technology, has state problem)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(artificial intelligence, has state challenge)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(discipline, has state problem)