artificial intelligence: is scary

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.68
, computer science
Weight: 0.65
, development
Weight: 0.64
, discipline
Weight: 0.63
, intelligence
Weight: 0.62
Siblings military intelligence
Weight: 0.39
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.34
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.33
, logic
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is scary 1.00
is dangerous 0.78
is interesting 0.75
be kind of dumb 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(computer science, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, is scary)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(artificial intelligence, is scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(computer science, is interesting)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, is scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is interesting)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(computer science, is interesting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(artificial intelligence, is scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(artificial intelligence, is scary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(artificial intelligence, is scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(artificial intelligence, is scary)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(artificial intelligence, is scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(artificial intelligence, be kind of dumb)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(artificial intelligence, is scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, be kind of dumb)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(artificial intelligence, is scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(artificial intelligence, be kind of dumb)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(artificial intelligence, is scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, be kind of dumb)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(artificial intelligence, is scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, is interesting)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(artificial intelligence, is scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, is scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, is scary)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(artificial intelligence, is scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(artificial intelligence, is scary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(artificial intelligence, is scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(computer science, is interesting)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(artificial intelligence, is scary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(computer science, is interesting)