artificial turf: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surface
Weight: 0.68
, material
Weight: 0.59
, construction
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings asphalt
Weight: 0.34
, sand
Weight: 0.33
, ground
Weight: 0.33
, clay
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(construction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(artificial turf, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(artificial turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(construction, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(artificial turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(construction, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(artificial turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(asphalt, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(artificial turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ground, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(construction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(artificial turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(artificial turf, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(artificial turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(ground, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(ground, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(artificial turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(asphalt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(asphalt, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(artificial turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(artificial turf, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(artificial turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(artificial turf, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(artificial turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(artificial turf, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(artificial turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(artificial turf, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(artificial turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(artificial turf, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(artificial turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(artificial turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(artificial turf, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(artificial turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(artificial turf, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(artificial turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(construction, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(artificial turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ground, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(artificial turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(asphalt, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(artificial turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(construction, has quality good)