asset: be split in divorce

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loan
Weight: 0.68
, option
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, customer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings experience
Weight: 0.64
, talent
Weight: 0.64
, good will
Weight: 0.57
, domain
Weight: 0.55
, farmland
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be split in divorce 1.00
be split after divorce 0.99
be split up in divorce 0.99
be divided in divorce 0.96
be split in divorce in virginia 0.92
be divided in divorce in sc 0.85
be divided in marriage 0.85
be divided in 16-month marriage 0.85
be split between husband 0.84
has shape split 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(asset, be split in divorce)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(asset, be split after divorce)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(asset, be split up in divorce)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(asset, be divided in divorce)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(asset, be divided in divorce)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(asset, be divided in divorce)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(asset, be split in divorce in virginia)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(asset, be divided in divorce)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(asset, be split after divorce)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(asset, be split up in divorce)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(asset, be split after divorce)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(asset, be split after divorce)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(asset, be split up in divorce)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(asset, be split up in divorce)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(asset, be split in divorce in virginia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(asset, be split in divorce in virginia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(asset, be split in divorce in virginia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(asset, be divided in marriage)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(asset, be divided in divorce in sc)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(asset, be split between husband)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(asset, be divided in 16-month marriage)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(asset, has shape split)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(asset, be divided in marriage)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(asset, be divided in divorce in sc)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(asset, be split between husband)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(asset, be divided in divorce in sc)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(asset, be divided in 16-month marriage)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(asset, be divided in marriage)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(asset, be divided in marriage)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(asset, has shape split)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(asset, be divided in divorce in sc)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(asset, be divided in 16-month marriage)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(asset, be split between husband)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(asset, be divided in 16-month marriage)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(asset, has shape split)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(asset, be split between husband)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(asset, has shape split)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(asset, be split in divorce)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(asset, be split in divorce)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(asset, be split in divorce)