asset: come about within functioning of system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loan
Weight: 0.68
, option
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, customer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings experience
Weight: 0.64
, talent
Weight: 0.64
, good will
Weight: 0.57
, domain
Weight: 0.55
, farmland
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
come about within functioning of system 1.00
come about within functioning 0.98
come about within functioning of financial system 0.96
work in system 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(loan, work in system)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(asset, come about within functioning of system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(asset, come about within functioning of system)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(loan, work in system)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(asset, come about within functioning of system)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(loan, work in system)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(loan, work in system)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(asset, come about within functioning of system)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(asset, come about within functioning of system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(asset, come about within functioning of system)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(asset, come about within functioning of system)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(asset, come about within functioning of system)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(asset, come about within functioning)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(asset, come about within functioning of system)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(asset, come about within functioning of financial system)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(asset, come about within functioning of system)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(asset, come about within functioning)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(asset, come about within functioning of system)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(asset, come about within functioning of financial system)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(asset, come about within functioning of system)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(asset, come about within functioning)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(asset, come about within functioning of system)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(asset, come about within functioning of financial system)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(asset, come about within functioning of system)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(asset, come about within functioning of financial system)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(asset, come about within functioning of system)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(asset, come about within functioning)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(asset, come about within functioning of system)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(asset, come about within functioning of system)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(asset, come about within functioning of system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(asset, come about within functioning of system)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(asset, come about within functioning of system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(asset, come about within functioning of system)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(loan, work in system)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(asset, come about within functioning of system)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(loan, work in system)