assimilation: be seen as big thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents policy
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.53
, concept
Weight: 0.53
, process
Weight: 0.52
Siblings segregation
Weight: 0.33
, alienation
Weight: 0.32
, culture
Weight: 0.32
, nationalism
Weight: 0.32
, migration
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be seen as big thing 1.00
be seen as thing 0.97
be seen as bad thing 0.96
is good thing 0.87
is thing 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(nationalism, be seen as bad thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(migration, is good thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(segregation, is thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(migration, is thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(nationalism, be seen as bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(nationalism, be seen as bad thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(migration, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(migration, is thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(segregation, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(segregation, is thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(migration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(migration, is good thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(assimilation, be seen as big thing)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(assimilation, be seen as thing)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(assimilation, be seen as bad thing)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(assimilation, be seen as bad thing)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(assimilation, be seen as bad thing)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(assimilation, be seen as thing)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(assimilation, be seen as bad thing)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(assimilation, is thing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(assimilation, is thing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(assimilation, is good thing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(assimilation, be seen as thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(assimilation, is thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(assimilation, is good thing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(assimilation, is good thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(assimilation, is good thing)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(assimilation, be seen as thing)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(assimilation, is thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(assimilation, be seen as big thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(assimilation, be seen as big thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(nationalism, be seen as bad thing)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(migration, is thing)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(segregation, is thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(assimilation, be seen as big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(migration, is good thing)