assonance: is effective

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.52
Siblings metronome
Weight: 0.32
, sound card
Weight: 0.31
, thermistor
Weight: 0.31
, electronic device
Weight: 0.31
, galvanometer
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is effective 1.00
be effective 0.99
be efficient 100 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(device, be efficient 100) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(assonance, is effective)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(assonance, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(device, be efficient 100)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(assonance, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(device, be efficient 100)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(device, be efficient 100) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(assonance, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(assonance, is effective)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(assonance, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(assonance, is effective)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(assonance, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(assonance, be effective)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(assonance, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(assonance, be effective)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(assonance, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(assonance, be effective)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(assonance, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(assonance, be effective)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(assonance, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(assonance, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(assonance, is effective)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(assonance, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(assonance, is effective)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(assonance, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(device, be efficient 100)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(assonance, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(device, be efficient 100)