asthenosphere: be important part of mantle

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mantle
Weight: 0.43
Siblings lithosphere
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important part of mantle 1.00
be called mantle vacuo 0.96
be weaker than rest of mantle 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mantle, be called mantle vacuo)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(asthenosphere, be important part of mantle)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(asthenosphere, be important part of mantle)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mantle, be called mantle vacuo)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(asthenosphere, be important part of mantle)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(mantle, be called mantle vacuo)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(mantle, be called mantle vacuo)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(asthenosphere, be important part of mantle)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(asthenosphere, be important part of mantle)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(asthenosphere, be important part of mantle)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(asthenosphere, be important part of mantle)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(asthenosphere, be important part of mantle)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(asthenosphere, be weaker than rest of mantle)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(asthenosphere, be important part of mantle)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(asthenosphere, be weaker than rest of mantle)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(asthenosphere, be important part of mantle)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(asthenosphere, be weaker than rest of mantle)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(asthenosphere, be important part of mantle)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(asthenosphere, be weaker than rest of mantle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(asthenosphere, be important part of mantle)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(asthenosphere, be important part of mantle)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(asthenosphere, be important part of mantle)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(asthenosphere, be important part of mantle)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(asthenosphere, be important part of mantle)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(asthenosphere, be important part of mantle)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mantle, be called mantle vacuo)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(asthenosphere, be important part of mantle)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mantle, be called mantle vacuo)