astronomy: is good career

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.63
, art
Weight: 0.62
, study
Weight: 0.62
, science
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, physics
Weight: 0.35
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good career 1.00
is career 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is good career)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, is career)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is career)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(computer science, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(computer science, is good career)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(computer science, is career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(computer science, is career)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(meteorology, is career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(meteorology, is career)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(astronomy, is good career)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(astronomy, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(astronomy, is career)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(astronomy, is career)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(astronomy, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(astronomy, is career)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(astronomy, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is career)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(astronomy, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(astronomy, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is good career)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(astronomy, is good career)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(computer science, is career)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer science, is good career)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(meteorology, is career)