astronomy: was different from earlier astronomy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.63
, art
Weight: 0.62
, study
Weight: 0.62
, science
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, physics
Weight: 0.35
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was different from earlier astronomy 1.00
was different from astronomy 0.96
be related to physics 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, was different from earlier astronomy)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, be related to physics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, was different from earlier astronomy)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(mathematics, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mathematics, be related to physics)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, was different from earlier astronomy)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(astronomy, was different from earlier astronomy)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(astronomy, was different from earlier astronomy)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(astronomy, was different from astronomy)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(astronomy, was different from earlier astronomy)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(astronomy, was different from astronomy)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, was different from earlier astronomy)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(astronomy, was different from astronomy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(astronomy, was different from earlier astronomy)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(astronomy, be related to physics)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(astronomy, was different from earlier astronomy)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, was different from astronomy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(astronomy, was different from earlier astronomy)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(astronomy, be related to physics)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, was different from earlier astronomy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(astronomy, be related to physics)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(astronomy, was different from earlier astronomy)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be related to physics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(astronomy, was different from earlier astronomy)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(astronomy, was different from earlier astronomy)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, was different from earlier astronomy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(astronomy, was different from earlier astronomy)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(astronomy, was different from earlier astronomy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, was different from earlier astronomy)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(mathematics, be related to physics)