astronomy: was invented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.63
, art
Weight: 0.62
, study
Weight: 0.62
, science
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, mathematics
Weight: 0.35
, physics
Weight: 0.35
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was invented 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(art, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(astronomy, was invented)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(science, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(astronomy, was invented)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(astronomy, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(science, was invented)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(astronomy, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(art, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(art, was invented)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(science, was invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(art, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(astronomy, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(astronomy, was invented)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(science, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(astronomy, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(astronomy, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(astronomy, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(astronomy, was invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(astronomy, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(astronomy, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, was invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(astronomy, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(astronomy, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(science, was invented)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(art, was invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(astronomy, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(science, was invented)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(astronomy, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(art, was invented)