athelete: play soccer

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents people
Weight: 0.35
Siblings young person
Weight: 0.28
, hockey player
Weight: 0.28
, good person
Weight: 0.27
, sportsman
Weight: 0.27
, anybody
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
play soccer 1.00
play tennis 0.87
be at hockey game 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(athelete, play soccer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, play soccer)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(athelete, play soccer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, be at hockey game)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(athelete, play soccer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(hockey player, play soccer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(hockey player, play soccer)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(athelete, play soccer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(hockey player, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(hockey player, be at hockey game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(athelete, play soccer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(athelete, play soccer)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(athelete, play soccer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(athelete, play tennis)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(athelete, play soccer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(athelete, play tennis)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(athelete, play soccer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(athelete, play tennis)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(athelete, play soccer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(athelete, play tennis)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(athelete, play soccer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(athelete, play soccer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(athelete, play soccer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(athelete, play soccer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(athelete, play soccer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(athelete, play soccer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(hockey player, play soccer)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(athelete, play soccer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(hockey player, be at hockey game)