athlete: be at gym

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents individual
Weight: 0.63
, artist
Weight: 0.61
, injury
Weight: 0.59
, competitor
Weight: 0.58
Siblings football player
Weight: 0.80
, hockey player
Weight: 0.79
, wrestler
Weight: 0.78
, tennis player
Weight: 0.78
, gymnast
Weight: 0.76

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at gym 1.00
be at locker room 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(athlete, be at gym)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(gymnast, be at gym)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(athlete, be at gym)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(gymnast, be at gym)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(gymnast, be at gym)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(athlete, be at gym)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(athlete, be at gym)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(athlete, be at gym)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(athlete, be at locker room)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(athlete, be at gym)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(athlete, be at locker room)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(athlete, be at gym)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(athlete, be at locker room)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(athlete, be at gym)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(athlete, be at locker room)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(athlete, be at gym)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(athlete, be at gym)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(athlete, be at gym)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(athlete, be at gym)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(athlete, be at gym)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(athlete, be at gym)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(gymnast, be at gym)