athletics: be in glasgow

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents department
Weight: 0.63
, game
Weight: 0.63
, field
Weight: 0.62
, talent
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.57
Siblings football field
Weight: 0.37
, football game
Weight: 0.36
, hockey game
Weight: 0.36
, football
Weight: 0.35
, baseball game
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in glasgow 1.00
is qld 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(athletics, be in glasgow)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(athletics, be in glasgow)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(athletics, be in glasgow)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(athletics, is qld)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(athletics, be in glasgow)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(athletics, is qld)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(athletics, be in glasgow)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(athletics, is qld)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(athletics, be in glasgow)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(athletics, is qld)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(athletics, be in glasgow)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(athletics, be in glasgow)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(athletics, be in glasgow)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(athletics, be in glasgow)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(athletics, be in glasgow)