atlas: be related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.59
, tool
Weight: 0.54
, name
Weight: 0.52
, film
Weight: 0.45
, book
Weight: 0.43
Siblings map
Weight: 0.34
, mapping
Weight: 0.33
, dictionary
Weight: 0.32
, calculator
Weight: 0.32
, compass
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related 1.00
be as zeus related 0.96
be as related 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(atlas, be related)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(calculator, be related)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(atlas, be related)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(map, be related)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(atlas, be related)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(map, be related)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(map, be related)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(atlas, be related)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(calculator, be related)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(calculator, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(atlas, be related)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(atlas, be related)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(atlas, be related)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(atlas, be as zeus related)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(atlas, be related)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(atlas, be as related)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(atlas, be related)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(atlas, be as related)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(atlas, be related)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(atlas, be as zeus related)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(atlas, be related)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(atlas, be as zeus related)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(atlas, be related)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(atlas, be as related)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(atlas, be related)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(atlas, be as zeus related)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(atlas, be related)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(atlas, be as related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(atlas, be related)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(atlas, be related)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(atlas, be related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(atlas, be related)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(atlas, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(atlas, be related)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(map, be related)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(atlas, be related)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(calculator, be related)