atm: charge fees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, credit card
Weight: 0.58
, electronic device
Weight: 0.57
, debit card
Weight: 0.57
, option
Weight: 0.56
Siblings sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.33
, alot
Weight: 0.33
, florence
Weight: 0.33
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.33
, mastercard
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
charge fees 1.00
have fees 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(credit card, have fees)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(atm, charge fees)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(atm, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(credit card, have fees)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(atm, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(credit card, have fees)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(credit card, have fees)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(atm, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(atm, charge fees)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(atm, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(atm, charge fees)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(atm, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(atm, have fees)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(atm, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(atm, have fees)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(atm, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(atm, have fees)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(atm, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(atm, have fees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(atm, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(atm, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(atm, charge fees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(atm, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(atm, charge fees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(atm, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(credit card, have fees)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(atm, charge fees)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(credit card, have fees)