atomic number: be better than mass

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents information
Weight: 0.54
, property
Weight: 0.48
Siblings military intelligence
Weight: 0.31
, computer database
Weight: 0.31
, historical site
Weight: 0.30
, telephone numbers
Weight: 0.30
, intelligence
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than mass 1.00
be better than atomic mass 0.84
be differ from mass number 0.79
be more important than strength 0.77
is more important 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be better than mass)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(intelligence, be more important than strength)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be better than mass)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(intelligence, is more important)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(atomic number, be better than mass)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(intelligence, be more important than strength)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(intelligence, be more important than strength)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(atomic number, be better than mass)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(intelligence, is more important)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(intelligence, is more important)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(atomic number, be better than mass)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(atomic number, be better than mass)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(atomic number, be better than mass)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be better than atomic mass)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(atomic number, be better than mass)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(atomic number, be better than atomic mass)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(atomic number, be better than mass)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(atomic number, be differ from mass number)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(atomic number, be better than mass)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be differ from mass number)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(atomic number, be better than mass)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(atomic number, be differ from mass number)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(atomic number, be better than mass)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(atomic number, be better than atomic mass)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(atomic number, be better than mass)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(atomic number, be differ from mass number)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(atomic number, be better than mass)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(atomic number, be better than atomic mass)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(atomic number, be better than mass)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(atomic number, be better than mass)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be better than mass)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(atomic number, be better than mass)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(atomic number, be better than mass)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be better than mass)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(intelligence, be more important than strength)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be better than mass)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(intelligence, is more important)