atomic number: be calculated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents information
Weight: 0.54
, property
Weight: 0.48
Siblings military intelligence
Weight: 0.31
, computer database
Weight: 0.31
, historical site
Weight: 0.30
, telephone numbers
Weight: 0.30
, intelligence
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be calculated 1.00
be measured 0.79
is measured 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(intelligence, be measured)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(intelligence, be measured)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(intelligence, is measured)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(atomic number, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(intelligence, is measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(intelligence, is measured)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(atomic number, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(intelligence, be measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(intelligence, be measured)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(atomic number, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(intelligence, be measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(intelligence, be measured)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(atomic number, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(atomic number, be calculated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(atomic number, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(atomic number, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be calculated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(atomic number, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(atomic number, be calculated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(intelligence, is measured)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(intelligence, be measured)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(atomic number, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(intelligence, be measured)