attack: how prevented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents move
Weight: 0.60
, command
Weight: 0.60
, atrocity
Weight: 0.59
, challenge
Weight: 0.58
Siblings blast
Weight: 0.63
, assault
Weight: 0.62
, counterattack
Weight: 0.62
, shooting
Weight: 0.61
, strike
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
how prevented 1.00
be prevented 0.91
be avoided 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(attack, how prevented)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(strike, be avoided)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(attack, how prevented)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(strike, be avoided)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(strike, be avoided)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(attack, how prevented)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(attack, how prevented)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(attack, how prevented)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(attack, be prevented)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(attack, how prevented)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(attack, be prevented)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(attack, how prevented)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(attack, be prevented)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(attack, how prevented)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(attack, be prevented)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(attack, how prevented)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(attack, be prevented)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(attack, how prevented)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(attack, be prevented)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(attack, how prevented)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(attack, be prevented)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(attack, how prevented)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(attack, be prevented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(attack, how prevented)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(attack, how prevented)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(attack, how prevented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(attack, how prevented)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(attack, how prevented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(attack, how prevented)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(strike, be avoided)