attitude: has state offense

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.69
, trait
Weight: 0.68
, attribute
Weight: 0.64
, feeling
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.63
Siblings humility
Weight: 0.70
, pride
Weight: 0.62
, satisfaction
Weight: 0.62
, honesty
Weight: 0.35
, tendency
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state offense 1.00
is bannable offense 0.98
is offensive 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attitude, has state offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pride, is offensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(attitude, has state offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(pride, is offensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(pride, is offensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(attitude, has state offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(attitude, has state offense)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(attitude, has state offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(attitude, is bannable offense)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(attitude, has state offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(attitude, is bannable offense)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(attitude, has state offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(attitude, is bannable offense)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(attitude, has state offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(attitude, is bannable offense)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(attitude, has state offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(attitude, has state offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attitude, has state offense)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(attitude, has state offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(attitude, has state offense)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attitude, has state offense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(pride, is offensive)