attorney: be need to settle case

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents defense attorney
Weight: 0.74
, agent
Weight: 0.62
, office
Weight: 0.62
, witness
Weight: 0.61
Siblings prosecutor
Weight: 0.62
, solicitor
Weight: 0.35
, doctor office
Weight: 0.34
, sheriff
Weight: 0.33
, representative
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be need to settle case 1.00
prove case 0.79
ready his case 0.78
state case 0.78
be used to get some work do 0.76
state his case 0.75
be used to get work do 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(defense attorney, ready his case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(attorney, be need to settle case)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(office, be used to get some work do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(attorney, be need to settle case)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(office, be used to get work do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(attorney, be need to settle case)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(office, be used to get some work do)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(office, be used to get work do)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(defense attorney, ready his case)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(office, be used to get work do)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(defense attorney, ready his case)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(office, be used to get some work do)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(prosecutor, state case)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(defense attorney, ready his case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(attorney, be need to settle case)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(office, be used to get some work do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(attorney, be need to settle case)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(office, be used to get work do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(attorney, be need to settle case)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(prosecutor, state case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(prosecutor, state case)

Salient implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(attorney, be need to settle case)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(attorney, prove case)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(attorney, prove case)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(attorney, state his case)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(attorney, prove case)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(attorney, state his case)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(attorney, state his case)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(attorney, state his case)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(attorney, prove case)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be need to settle case)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(attorney, be need to settle case)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(defense attorney, ready his case)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(office, be used to get work do)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(office, be used to get some work do)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(prosecutor, state case)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(defense attorney, ready his case)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(office, be used to get work do)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(attorney, be need to settle case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(office, be used to get some work do)