attorney: do pro bono work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents defense attorney
Weight: 0.74
, agent
Weight: 0.62
, office
Weight: 0.62
, witness
Weight: 0.61
Siblings partner
Weight: 0.65
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.62
, associate
Weight: 0.59
, paralegal
Weight: 0.57
, solicitor
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
do pro bono work 1.00
do pro bono 0.99

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(attorney, do pro bono work)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, do pro bono)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(attorney, do pro bono work)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(solicitor, do pro bono)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(solicitor, do pro bono)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(attorney, do pro bono work)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(attorney, do pro bono work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(attorney, do pro bono work)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(attorney, do pro bono work)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(attorney, do pro bono work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(attorney, do pro bono work)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(attorney, do pro bono work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(attorney, do pro bono work)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(solicitor, do pro bono)